soulping ([personal profile] soulping) wrote2014-10-01 05:38 pm

GULGALLANA

[. . . you wake up laying prone on your stomach on a swaying hanging bird cage. The entire room around you is dark, making it impossible to tell what your surroundings are. The cage is plenty large enough to fit you and your team, and the iron bars are far too tough to be broken. The cage is suspended by rickety chains over a large pit of fire]

[NEEDLESS TO SAY. . . falling would not be a pleasant experience]

[You can see the other team cages suspended in the air around you. They're far enough away that you can easily hold a private conversation with your team, but close enough that if you yell really loudly, you may be able to talk to them]

[The strange voice speaks up again]

If your oh so caring Haunt is light, then you may consider me d̗͙͊͗a̯̽̒͆ͥ̅r̬̺̙̠͖̠̥ͥk̰̦̲̄n̞̰̠̲͍͍̿̇̎͋͑̆e̜̰ͤͥ̇́̂͌s͚ͤ͗s͔̯͉̰͍͍̥̏ͦ̇͆ͩ̋͋. I will be running this game now-- my name is of no importance to you sorry lot. Listen up, and listen up well.

See those chains? Ah yes, the ones that are keeping you from plummeting to your deaths below. They're old, rickety, and weak. Too much weight will surely break them. So what do you think your goal is? That's right! Try to break the other teams' chains, while keeping yours safe! Ahahaha! Let's see how well you all do!

Ah. . . right. And one last thing.

If every team winds up with the exact same amount of stones, then I'll make sure e̺̪ͥ̽̉̽̈́̈́̌ ́́͗v͂ͭ̐ͫͭ̾ ̰̦͎̬͚ͮ͒̍e̳̼͔̤̼͐̓ͨ̍ͤ̏ ͌̏̓̑͊̉r̭̗̰̬̫͕ͯ ̜̲̩̠̪̥̱͐̿͑͋͐̅̀y̘̓͌ ̪̻̲̪͎̰̤o̺̮͇͇̒̅ ̣̟̞̜̥̪̰̊ͧ̅n͍̺͎̯̰̠ ̤͔̘͉͉̼e̜͚̤͕̻͊͐̈́̒̂̃ͣ ̤̝̦̦͈̹ͯ̓̅̎̈̆̀'̣̞̯ ̝͈̭̪̤̇̈ͮ͑͛ͮ̋s̗̠͚̦̤̭̥̔̈́͌ͪͯ̈̎ chains break.
beathach: (72)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] beathach 2014-10-01 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
[. . . pushes himself up, carefully, so he's seated instead, crosslegged]

Of course.
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-01 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I saw this coming.

[But yes, also moving to sit.]
beathach: (49)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] beathach 2014-10-01 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't see it coming, really, but I can't say I'm surprised.
Edited 2014-10-01 23:27 (UTC)
debate_avenger: (My plans are already in motion)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-01 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
The one who was "running it" didn't send out the call. Reasoning indicates that she was running the game with someone else. And whoever it was established the rules for the game.
beathach: (26)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] beathach 2014-10-01 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
It seems that way, mm. This one hasn't shown up before, have they?
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-01 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Not that I know of, but obviously Haunt was in contact with them -- the non-interference rule exists to prevent this kind of thing from happening, which means that whoever it is, had permission to do so.

That doesn't really change our situation, though.
beathach: (37)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] beathach 2014-10-01 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
One has to wonder if Haunt has this planned, or if the other took over.

But no, it doesn't. [he really doesn't want to do this, dammit]
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-01 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, there's also another possibility, but I would need more evidence for it.

My suggestion would be to place 2 stones on one team, and one stone on another. We absolutely need to avoid everyone keeping a n equal number.
beathach: (13)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] beathach 2014-10-01 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
[he frowns, but he knows she's right. He takes a deep breath and lets it out slowly]

Which . . . team would you suggest, then? To give two stones.
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-01 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Barghest and Alectryon are usually our first choices here, followed by Henwen and Vanara.

...Unfortunately, they're everyone else's first choices too, and we need to protect everyone else for various reasons.
beathach: (46)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] beathach 2014-10-01 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
. . . so we'd have to choose a team who wouldn't be everyone's first choice. Someone we wouldn't normally play against. Right?
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-01 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Right. The problem is that there's someone important to protect for at least one member of our team, except for those four.
beathach: (74)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] beathach 2014-10-01 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I know. But - but playing on them doesn't necessarily mean they'll -

[he isn't saying it]

We don't have a choice, Diz.
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-01 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Then it's time for the emergency situations: Which teams do you absolutely want to protect? If it comes down to this, we can only protect the teams important to us personally.
beathach: (67)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] beathach 2014-10-01 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Ometotchtli and Epona.

[he reaches up to rub at his face, under his glasses] I can't play against them.
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-01 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I can't attack Dawon or Amalthea, though I would like to request we don't go after Takshaka.

[It's complicated.]

Then, let's see... two on Tiamat, and... one on Ratatoskr?
Edited 2014-10-02 00:00 (UTC)
beathach: (77)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] beathach 2014-10-02 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
I'm fine with that, mm. I'd . . . honestly would rather not play on Takshaka either.
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-02 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
I'll go move the stones, then.

[Let's hope nobody we care about dies.]
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

DECIISION

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-02 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
2 to Ratatoskr
1 to Tiamat
beathach: (01)

Re: Round 1

[personal profile] beathach 2014-10-02 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
[fingers and toes crossed]
beathach: (74)

[personal profile] beathach 2014-10-02 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
[even if Miles isn't here WOW THERE WENT ONE OF HIS PROTECTED TEAMS]
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-02 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
[...Yeah, sorry about that.]

...We couldn't help them. From this point on, at least four more teams will go down, too. More if they're tied with them at the end.
beathach: (35)

[personal profile] beathach 2014-10-02 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
. . . [he nods, after a moment]

We only have one this time. Who are we giving it to?
Edited 2014-10-02 01:36 (UTC)

Page 1 of 3