soulping ([personal profile] soulping) wrote2015-08-02 09:30 am

Vanara / Alectryon / Caracal.

[ And, with a start, you're somewhere else: A small, whitewashed room with another tinny woman's voice rattling off the walls. ]
unquailified: (Poof you’re a fish)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] unquailified 2015-08-01 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
They are a strength. There's no question about it.
trainedarmy: <lj user=ajna> (brush ya teeth homie!!!)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] trainedarmy 2015-08-02 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
I'm in agreement with this. I believe bonds are important.
allergictostairs: (**06)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] allergictostairs 2015-08-02 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
Umm... "strength" works for me, too.
gateofbabbylon: (when we're together)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] gateofbabbylon 2015-08-02 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
I believe in weaknesses' potential to turn into strengths so that works for me.
ladychapels: (whispered somethings)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] ladychapels 2015-08-02 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
[ her silence here can likely be taken as—if not agreement, then not disagreement, either. ]
timescars: (so familiar a gleam)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] timescars 2015-08-02 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
Isn't strength too obvious an answer?
unquailified: (sew your head onto a walrus)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] unquailified 2015-08-02 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
Sometimes the obvious answer is still the correct one.
timescars: (met you in front of a diner)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] timescars 2015-08-02 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
Is that often the case?
unquailified: (They’ll tell your mom)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] unquailified 2015-08-02 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
I'm inclined it is in this situation.
gateofbabbylon: (and staring back at me again)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] gateofbabbylon 2015-08-02 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
When there are only two answers, isn't one going to seem obvious? That doesn't make it a trick.

Do you see an advantage to choosing weakness?
timescars: (i'm the fan of flying)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] timescars 2015-08-02 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
[ nods ]

Very well.
timescars: (but i think you're a nice guy)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] timescars 2015-08-02 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Perhaps. I do not know what our strengths are and I rather they not be targeted.
gateofbabbylon: (take your time)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] gateofbabbylon 2015-08-02 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Agreed to that, but strength and weakness can be a matter of perspective as much as anything.
timescars: (living in the garden of evil)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] timescars 2015-08-02 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
So we have no way of knowing or making the right choice?
gateofbabbylon: (never said anything else)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] gateofbabbylon 2015-08-02 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
[sighing] Some games are run so that every answer is a wrong answer in a different way. I don't know if that's the case here... but it's possible.
trainedarmy: <lj user=ajna> (DONT TRUST ATOMS)

Re: Turn in.

[personal profile] trainedarmy 2015-08-02 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
It is a strength.
timescars: (i know what you'll do)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] timescars 2015-08-02 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
. . . [ she nods, not pleased, but has little else to add ]
gateofbabbylon: (stay awhile)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] gateofbabbylon 2015-08-02 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
[noticing her expression]

It's not pleasant, but it's better to know upfront.
allergictostairs: (**07)

Re: Discussion.

[personal profile] allergictostairs 2015-08-02 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
[Looking kind of unsure about this.]

Page 1 of 8