soulping ([personal profile] soulping) wrote2016-02-13 05:53 pm

BARGHEST + TIAMAT

[ The paths lead to a room -- well not a room. A clearing of trees, wherein a large oaken table sits in the center, with chairs for every member present. ]

[ In the center of the table, there is a deep-set burning flame. At each chair, glass stones glisten. ]
compensate: (Naïve Newcomer)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] compensate 2016-02-14 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
[ more bullshit, huh... ]
fuhrinkaed: (I see.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fuhrinkaed 2016-02-14 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
[Yep. This is a game.]

Okay... the first round there's not a lot of likelihood any one person will hit the ten they need.

We should just play on whoever seems right, I think, and see what the situation is at the start of round two.
withmyownfists: by kimmeh & verisimilitude @ plurk (troubled)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] withmyownfists 2016-02-14 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
This...

[ THE HECK KIND OF GAME IS THIS!? ]
tatsumi_textiles: (...ow)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] tatsumi_textiles 2016-02-14 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
[ Ochre stumbled in late, missing the mingle- and the rules list makes him groan ]

Great.

We're screwed.
withmyownfists: by kimmeh & verisimilitude @ plurk (worried)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] withmyownfists 2016-02-14 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
How do we determine who seems 'right?'
withmyownfists: by verisimilitude @ plurk (wtf)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] withmyownfists 2016-02-14 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
Don't say that! Why would you say something like that!?
compensate: (pic#9831840)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] compensate 2016-02-14 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
[ sighs, but ruffles her hair ]

bUllshIt, bUt iT'll wORk OUt.
compensate: (Photographic Memory)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] compensate 2016-02-14 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
yOU'Re gIvINg uP EAsY.
fuhrinkaed: (I wonder about that...)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fuhrinkaed 2016-02-14 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
We each get three stones of our own, so we each cast our own stones.

For you, I'm thinking it'd be Yato, Yukine, and one other person. Get me?

Which leaves who I'm going to pick, too...
fuhrinkaed: (Is that so..?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fuhrinkaed 2016-02-14 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Nah, people like you.
tatsumi_textiles: (right no)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] tatsumi_textiles 2016-02-14 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Because we're Tiamat, and this is team verses team?

[ He has no hope for anyone voting for him. ]
compensate: (pic#9831834)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] compensate 2016-02-14 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
ANd hOW ARe wE deTERmInINg whO iS rIGHt?
tatsumi_textiles: (...right)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] tatsumi_textiles 2016-02-14 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
[ The blankest of stares. ]

Not after the Caretaker they don't.
tatsumi_textiles: (right no)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] tatsumi_textiles 2016-02-14 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
I ain't giving up, I'm being logical.

People're gonna vote on people they like.
fuhrinkaed: (Default)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fuhrinkaed 2016-02-14 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
[He pats his hand against his heart.]

You listen to this. Protect who you want to protect.

We all get three stones to protect someone with, so we'll start by doing that, and we'll strategize once we see where people are after that.
withmyownfists: by kimmeh & verisimilitude @ plurk (worried)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] withmyownfists 2016-02-14 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
[ well, no lies, considering that alectryon's not been out much lately, and yato makes himself so unlikeable--of course she'd protect them both first. but... ]

People need to get ten though, right? Is it... smarter, maybe, to give all three to one person each round? Or... one to each? --And what about everyone else we can't pick?
compensate: (Tsundere)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] compensate 2016-02-14 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
prObAblY, bUT yOU've gOt frIEndS, rIGHt?
withmyownfists: by verisimilitude @ plurk (strict)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] withmyownfists 2016-02-14 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Don't you dare talk like that. You have very loyal friends, both off and on this team, Ochre!
fuhrinkaed: (Well if you put it that way.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fuhrinkaed 2016-02-14 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
One to each--you can't do more than one per person per round.

Once we're out of round one, we can see who's below ten and where they are below ten--and that's when we start planning our plays. But for now, it's best to protect who you want to.
tatsumi_textiles: (Bitch please)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] tatsumi_textiles 2016-02-14 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
Friends who're either on my team, or've got more important people ta worry about.
fuhrinkaed: (Sounds delish!)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] fuhrinkaed 2016-02-14 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
Well.

I like you.
compensate: (Badass Baritone)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] compensate 2016-02-14 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
[ welp, that answer is good to him. you had him worried there for a second. ]

wORks fOR mE.

Page 1 of 11