saburai: (thoughtful ♙ and through correct and)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] saburai 2014-09-20 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
...I imagine we have to pick something in the crafts field, based on the description...
barrette: (♡ zap cannon。)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] barrette 2014-09-20 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Crafts, or we could do something with stables. Both sound like good options.
saburai: (unsure ♙ to strive for improvement)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] saburai 2014-09-20 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I thought the stables were mainly for travelers, but I suppose it's not particularly clear...
barrette: (♡ recycle。)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] barrette 2014-09-20 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm...

[ addressing the... air... ]

Miss Echo? Are we allowed to run our own stables, or do anything with them?
maidenof: (sleep)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] maidenof 2014-09-20 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
You are allowed to run whatever you like. I will place no limitations on your choice.
barrette: (♡ ingrain。)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] barrette 2014-09-20 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you!

[ to Crane; ]

It looks like we could run stables to take advantage of the travelers that come in, or we could run a craft business. Which one do you wanna do?
saburai: (thoughtful ♙ and through correct and)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] saburai 2014-09-21 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
...Having access to a potentially wider variety of travelers might be more useful, assuming that we do good business.
barrette: (♡ whirlpool。)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] barrette 2014-09-21 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
So... the stables, then?
saburai: (ashamed ♙ courtesy and honor)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] saburai 2014-09-21 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
Well, it depends on what you think as well.
barrette: (♡ stone edge。)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] barrette 2014-09-21 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
I'd be happy with that!
saburai: (factual ♙ to hold in esteem human)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] saburai 2014-09-21 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
Then yes, the stables will work.
barrette: (♡ low sweep。)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] barrette 2014-09-21 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
Then we've got our plan!
barrette: (♡ reflect type。)

Re: TURN-IN

[personal profile] barrette 2014-09-21 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Stables.
barrette: (♡ thunder fang。)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] barrette 2014-09-21 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
I think we should help get the road fixed. Maybe... hmm, offering discounted services and stabling to anyone who helps out?
saburai: (thoughtful ♙ and through correct and)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] saburai 2014-09-21 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
I imagine most travelers would want to fix it as well, since the damage will make it more difficult for them to leave. So it may not take much to convince them to help.
saburai: (thoughtful ♙ and through correct and)

Re: R2 Discussion

[personal profile] saburai 2014-09-21 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
It doesn't look like there's much we could feasibly do, this round...
saburai: (factual ♙ to hold in esteem human)

Re: R2 Turn-In

[personal profile] saburai 2014-09-21 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
While we cannot alter the legal decision, we will institute a policy in which we reserve the right to evict any lodger who is involved in a physical altercation in order to help discourage such activities. No troublemakers are welcomed here.

As for the attractions...we are not an entertainment business, and so cannot do anything to "attract" potential customers. We will still offer competitive rates and a decent place to stay, but anything more is the duty of the business owners to implement, not us.
barrette: (♡ zap cannon。)

Re: Discussion

[personal profile] barrette 2014-09-21 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
Huh... I'd say we should go for the fourth option.
barrette: (♡ focus blast。)

Re: TURN-IN

[personal profile] barrette 2014-09-21 05:46 am (UTC)(link)
Supporting the fourth option!! VIVA LA REVOLUTION!!!!!