ALECTRYON

[soulping]

[ you enter one of the trains with a few of the other teams -- you have your own booths to coordinate your actions in, but you can always go up to the main table if you want to talk to any of the other teams playing with you. ]

Comments

Re: DISCUSSION

[nuketheskies]

I don't get it.

Re: DISCUSSION

[secare]

I think it should be easy enough. We need to make a god for starters.

Re: DISCUSSION

[nuketheskies]

What kind of god?

[ GODS SOUND TASTY ]

Re: DISCUSSION

[secare]

( immediately: )

A competent one. Someone with followers, a shrine, and makes good decisions for humans.

Re: DISCUSSION

[nuketheskies]

Doesn't every god have followers and a shrine? They wouldn't exist otherwise.

Re: DISCUSSION

[secare]

I know one who doesn't. He's pretty useless.

Re: DISCUSSION

[nuketheskies]

But how?

Re: DISCUSSION

[secare]

I'm his weapon.

( or was that not what was being asked? )

I dunno how he exists though, everyone else seems to have some standing as a god.

Re: DISCUSSION

[nuketheskies]

Well, we're definitely not gonna make a useless one.

Re: DISCUSSION

[secare]

So what kind do you want to make?

A stern god? A loving god?

Re: DISCUSSION

[nuketheskies]

Neither? Just a god that does stuff.

Re: DISCUSSION

[secare]

But what kind of stuff? I think they should have a little focus?

Re: DISCUSSION

[nuketheskies]

Energy! The sun!

Re: DISCUSSION

[secare]

Like Amaterasu?

Re: DISCUSSION

[nuketheskies]

Amaterasu's bigger than that. More like Yatagarasu!

[ I AM NOT BIASED AT ALL ]

Re: DISCUSSION

[secare]

The three-legged crow?

( man, he wouldn't know any of this if not for the occult info dump he got from someone else's shard. )

He's a god of guidance, so that's fine.

Re: DISCUSSION

[nuketheskies]

Right! And he embodies the sun, so it works!

What about traits?

Re: DISCUSSION

[secare]

Courage, wisdom, and strength?

Re: DISCUSSION

[nuketheskies]

We need bad ones too, like, um...

[ what can you even say that's bad about the sun ]

Destruction?

Re: DISCUSSION

[secare]

Then arrogance and . . . Uh. Short tempered?

Re: DISCUSSION

[nuketheskies]

Okay! That was easy.