soulping ([personal profile] soulping) wrote2014-01-17 08:55 pm

Takshaka

[The room you’ve been ushered into looks a lot like a team-colored version Rotten’s own. There’s all sorts of manga available to read in a bookshelf, on the wall, and even a low table to sit at if you want to. ...Unfortunately, it’s still all covered by a tarp, just the same as the original room. Whoops. On the bright side, there’s a laptop sitting on the table, but it only seems to be loading one page, some kind of BBS messaging system.]
takewing: (I'm leaving now.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] takewing 2014-01-19 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Try not to overthink it. The mechanics of this game are simple, so the solution is simple.

Human nature is what's difficult. That's the risk we're taking, here.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] experiencepoints 2014-01-19 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Even so, she must have realized this would happen.

... What if protecting everyone kills everyone instead?
takewing: (Third time's a charm.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] takewing 2014-01-19 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe she didn't. She's an idiot.

I'm not sure the Echoes lie about the rules of their games. Even Nyssa doesn't.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] experiencepoints 2014-01-19 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
We shouldn't be sure about that. It wouldn't necessarily be a lying, just omission.
takewing: (When you heard that.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] takewing 2014-01-19 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
She was fairly explicit about what is what.

Nightingale, can we try it? Please?

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] experiencepoints 2014-01-19 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
...

We have no choice, I think. I'll go input it.
takewing: (Put it away!)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] takewing 2014-01-19 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
[exhale]

Sparrow wanted to add something about Takshaka being a good modelling candidate, just in case.
Edited 2014-01-19 00:38 (UTC)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] experiencepoints 2014-01-19 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
... I disagree. We can't distract from the circle message. Adding in a bit that says 'if you deviate, attack us' only encourages everyone else to break the chain, and then we can't predict what will happen.
takewing: (With . . . uh . . .)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] takewing 2014-01-19 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
I agree with her sentiment, but in practice, I agree with you. This is unpredictable enough already.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] experiencepoints 2014-01-19 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
[Nods.]

Let's go as it is.
swordedpast: ♦ official art: fate/unlimited codes (let no idea of love; piety; or even)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] swordedpast 2014-01-19 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
Tch...it's a difficult risk, but can we risk not trying it, either?

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] experiencepoints 2014-01-19 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
We have time to consider a better plan.
swordedpast: ♦ battle moon wars (pic#6123640)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] swordedpast 2014-01-19 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
We could ask that fairy for more information.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] experiencepoints 2014-01-19 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
[AFTER I'M DONE PUNCHING YOU IN THE FACE WITH YOUR OWN HAND WHILE YOU TALK TO HER YOU MEAN]
swordedpast: ♦ official art: miscellaneous (there lies more peril in thine eye)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] swordedpast 2014-01-19 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
[yeah after that]

--did you hear what she said, though? After the rules are set, they can't be changed.

So if she didn't think her rules through, and we're able to save each other because of that, there's nothing she can do about it.

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] experiencepoints 2014-01-19 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
... No choice but to take a gamble.

[HEADING OVER TO INPUT]