soulping ([personal profile] soulping) wrote2016-02-02 07:23 pm

AMALTHEA

[You find yourself in one of Nyssa's quaint cottages - it's very comfortable, warm. There's water, tea, and a dining table with paper and pencils strewn across it.]
forthemackerel: <lj user=parachutes> (someone i am is waiting for courage)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
[ "comfortable" my ass. sorry, but he's on edge because this does bring back memories for him. but... at least Rook is here, he reminds himself to stay calm. ]

I don't like this.
unguilded: (grand master)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
Neither do I. And I don't know if everybody else would be...

A long time ago, before she became a patron, Rotten ran a bad game with the same rule: protect one team from getting mangled. People were allowed to send one message out for others to see, and only one. The messages varied, some saying a team was set to do something and weren't backing down, but a couple of them said ... "protect the team ahead of yours alphabetically, so everybody gets protected."

Somehow ... despite everything, everybody followed it, and nobody died. Every team won, which caused Rotten to almost use up all of her energy to give everybody memories. Since then, sometimes during meetings the teams have had in the past to discuss games like that and more, it's been somewhat of a word of mouth strategy if we're in a situation like that.

... but it's also been a while since we've had any teamswide meetings like that, and a lot of people have gone to sleep since then. So I don't know how many people still here would think to go to that.
forthemackerel: <lj user=parachutes> (i'm every man; i'm any man)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
And it doesn't seem like we can pass on any message to any other team... There's been a lot of changes in teams, so I doubt others would think about that...
unguilded: (pawned)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
We can't, but that was also why we discussed the possibility outside of a game. Because we figured things would always be different in some way, and I'm sure the other Echoes learned from Rotten's oversight.

But some people I saw before the game-- like Nightingale, Star, they were here back then. [Rubbing at his chin.]

Would either of you be opposed to trying that? It's a gamble, but ... pretty much everything is, and doing nothing seems like a waste in either case. If something goes wrong, I'll take responsibility for it.
forthemackerel: <lj user=parachutes> (but they weren't moved)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
You don't have to take responsibility for it alone. We're a team. We decide things together. I'm willing to do it with you.
unguilded: (bring the starlight)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
[Cascade my bae. ;; That gets him to smile a little.]

That sounds like something that I would say, too. I just suggested it since Barghest is the team after ours alphabetically. So it's not exactly aligned with our usual priorities, but ... I'd like to think even if there's a chance enough people do the same to at least cover a vast majority of us...

We still don't know what we're protecting each other from. Let's hope it's not as bad as Rotten's game that time. [Because she wanted guro art refs..........]
forthemackerel: <lj user=cherrytini> (there's a reason not to care)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
[ takes his hand here, too ]

Let's hope it was like that one game with the tea that she hosted before. Sometimes she doesn't always host awful games.

Either way, we'll get through it together, no matter the results.

[ Rotten, can you not........ ]
anewboy: (003)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] anewboy 2016-02-03 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. No matter what way we do this, we're in it together.

I sure hope she's goin' easy on us...

[There's a sigh]
forthemackerel: <lj user=parachutes> (the one i want;)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
It's happened. She likes to trick people into thinking it'll be worse on those games.

[ said very much from experience ]
unguilded: (knock knock)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
Heheeeeh...

[Grabbing Coin's hand, too! THREE WAY HAND HOLDING HOW SCANDALOUS.]

Right! Thank you guys, for agreeing to try this with me,
anewboy: (004)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] anewboy 2016-02-03 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
[OH MY, ROOK. He'll give a handsqueeze gently though and smile with a nod]

It's no problem.
forthemackerel: <lj user=parachutes> (an ordinary man quidam)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
[ shakes his head ]

You don't need to thank me. I appreciate that you're always willing to listen and offer suggestions.
unguilded: (everything I wish)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
Of course...! That's the most important thing ... in any game, no matter how good or bad.
forthemackerel: <lj user=demonia> (i won't heed you warnings)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
It is. That's why I'm always glad when we're in games together.
unguilded: (sealed move)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
That'd be a nice change.

[It's true she might just be looking for some more power. But those shadows being there... :l]

And we will. If it ends up being those dogs of hers, like she did with the Cats that time, let's hope she sends us mine if we don't get protection. I wouldn't lose to a cheap copy of myself even if it was just as strong.
forthemackerel: <lj user=cherrytini> (if I hide myself wherever i go)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
[ it could be like the tiara game... maybe bad games take more out of her and she needs some reserves from a non-trauma game. but he'll leave that unsaid, as they've been through shit together so they both know the shit she pulls ]

Neither of us will. I'll do what it takes to protect what we can.
unguilded: (perpetual check)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
[At those rules, he just ... tenses a bit.]

There might be too many new people here-- to probably do it...
anewboy: (003)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] anewboy 2016-02-03 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
So what should we do, then?

[He's still not happy about any of this and he's still on the hot end of pissy.]
unguilded: (out of dodge)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
[Well like he's explaining in more detail to Cascade:]

Not playing at all means one team goes without, so while that's an option, I think in this case it's a stupid one. That said ... in the past we've had the single protection rule in play before, and once in the past, everybody survived because they protected the team ahead of them alphabetically. We've talked about doing it if it ever happened again, but...
anewboy: (005)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] anewboy 2016-02-03 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
Too many new people...

[Including him since he didn't know til just now]
unguilded: (runaway lesbian)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
It's not even so much that as much as who was outside. Nightingale and Star were, and they were both around back then too.
unguilded: (sanctuary)

Re: SUBMIT

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
PROTECTING BARGHEST!!!1!
unguilded: (runaway lesbian)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
... [Narrowing his eyes.]
forthemackerel: <lj user=cherrytini> (been down here for days)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 04:01 am (UTC)(link)
...

[ what??? no. this isn't okay... ]
anewboy: (005)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] anewboy 2016-02-03 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
[He's frowning. Not liking this at all.]
forthemackerel: <lj user=parachutes> (i'm every man; i'm any man)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
...Someone must have protected us last round, too. Since nothing happened.
unguilded: (where the fuck am I)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. I wonder what-- happened in the last round. If anybody got hurt...

[Gritting his teeth a bit. And quickly does the math in his head.]

Assuming other teams have the same, twenty seven people, thirty six means of protection. But the individual aspect of it ruins the potential of hoping for any kind of strategy to ensure covering everybody.

So spreading and hoping for the best is probably the best choice to make. But then that leaves the question of ... who...
forthemackerel: <lj user=parachutes> (an ordinary man quidam)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe we should each pick one person from the list that we'd like to protect the most. That way we all get a say in who to cover.
unguilded: (nom)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
I was thinking that. I ... was going to suggest who you're probably going to choose, either way as one of them, if we were going to discuss it. But we can all take one choice to do as we will with.

But first, hmmn...
Edited 2016-02-03 04:25 (UTC)
anewboy: (008)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] anewboy 2016-02-03 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
My pick would either be one've the girls from Takshaka or someone from Dawon.

[Since they have the information. Those two teams mean the most to him after all

AT LEAST HE'S BEING HONEST ABOUT THIS?]
unguilded: (the finish line)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 04:41 am (UTC)(link)
[Those are two of our many alliances, so it's cool.]

Nightingale will most likely be covered by Henwen. And Cascade is going to pick Sakura. Star is someone else we want to look out for when we can, but someone from her world is also playing so I'm sure he'll cover her.
forthemackerel: <lj user=cherrytini> (does it almost feel like)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 04:28 am (UTC)(link)
But first...?
unguilded: (fool's mate)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 04:30 am (UTC)(link)
We have alliances for a reason, so to narrow things down a little based on people here who are on those teams... [Muttering to himself.] ... Opal is here, so she'll probably make sure Nightingale is safe if they're choosing. Coyote is here and he's from Star's world, if he and Tama do what we're doing, he'll choose her for sure, so Viva wouldn't have to worry if she was here.
forthemackerel: <lj user=parachutes> (the one i want;)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
You're right. That's something we should think about, too...
unguilded: (wings of honor)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
Those are the only two I'd be most convinced of. Otherwise, It's hard to really say.

... are you picking Sakura?
forthemackerel: <lj user=cherrytini> (nothing changed at all?)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] forthemackerel 2016-02-03 04:39 am (UTC)(link)
[ hesitates with that, but nods ]

...Yeah. I have to.
unguilded: (touch the clouds)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 04:43 am (UTC)(link)
I figured!

I'll pick Heels, then, since Nightingale should be okay with Opal here.
anewboy: (004)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] anewboy 2016-02-03 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
I'll go with Daisy.

[Since. Sabre's probably covered by someone in Takshaka. And he doesn't know Lilac as well and. He doesn't really. Know anyone else. l o l . . .]
anewboy: (012)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] anewboy 2016-02-03 04:38 am (UTC)(link)
[There's a nod in agreement at that]

Yeah.
unguilded: (guide the lost child)

Re: SUBMIT

[personal profile] unguilded 2016-02-03 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
Heels, Sakura, Daisy!