soulping ([personal profile] soulping) wrote2014-05-21 12:04 pm

TAKSHAKA TITULARY

[ A small team-coloured building awaits in front of you, ready for you to assume direct control! Can your business withstand the turbulent waters of capitalism? ]
pchaaair: (slowbro)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] pchaaair 2014-05-22 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. That is why I was considering that idea.
saburai: (Σ(-᷅_-᷄๑))

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] saburai 2014-05-22 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
[ Seriously thinking about this... ]

Losing 100 dollars per day still leaves us with a greater profit than expenditure, correct?
pchaaair: (onix)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] pchaaair 2014-05-22 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
I ... think so.
saburai: ((;¬_¬))

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] saburai 2014-05-22 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
Then taking the loss to increase future profits most likely is the right decision, since we'll still be making money.
pchaaair: (onix)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] pchaaair 2014-05-22 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
... Or we could do Sparrow's idea, which would keep our profits the same, right? While also giving a cheaper option.
saburai: (。◕‿◕。)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] saburai 2014-05-22 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
I agree, that's a much better solution. They get what they want without altering current profits.
pchaaair: (cubone)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] pchaaair 2014-05-22 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
It is a situation where everyone would win.
saburai: ((︶ω︶))

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] saburai 2014-05-22 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
The best sort of situation, I think.