soulping ([personal profile] soulping) wrote2014-10-14 03:34 pm

SEPSIS: COWS

[ It's time to explore a 2spooky place. Someone better have put the goggles on. ]
cihuatlatoani: (Neutral)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] cihuatlatoani 2014-10-15 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
How can we be certain which places do have items?
debate_avenger: (My plans are already in motion)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-15 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
The most likely places for items to be are places that send you off the track, or are in places unlikely to be checked. In the short version, that would be 2 and 7. In this long version, it's... 4 and 16, most likely.
cihuatlatoani: (Slight Surprise)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] cihuatlatoani 2014-10-15 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
You are certain the positioning is not randomized?
debate_avenger: (My plans are already in motion)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-15 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I believe it's randomized for the main path, at least. But I'm fairly certain that there will be an item at the end of the dead ends.
cihuatlatoani: (Neutral)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] cihuatlatoani 2014-10-15 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose it is worth a try.
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-15 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
Well then, we have another set of two traps... Do you think it's Sound or Smell this time?
cihuatlatoani: (Neutral2)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] cihuatlatoani 2014-10-15 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
Let us mark Smell, once again. However, we certainly have enough adrenaline to mark both.
Edited 2014-10-15 01:13 (UTC)
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-15 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
I'm mostly concerned about the next round, to be honest. When everything costs 30, we don't have enough for more than 5 spaces. 2 if we assume that there's a good chance of multiple traps on a space.
cihuatlatoani: (Neutral)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] cihuatlatoani 2014-10-15 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, but if there is a trap, we will able to regain some of the adrenaline that we lost. We are doing well so far, I do not believe we need to be so conservative right now.
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-15 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
That's true. I suppose I'm just worried about what happens when there's more stuff to mark than we have adrenaline for.
cihuatlatoani: (Brooding)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] cihuatlatoani 2014-10-15 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
We will be more cautious in the final round.
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-15 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
...Well, let's see... We have two sixth sense pings. I don't trust the one on 12 to be an item, but... We also have an ominous warning for 16.
Edited 2014-10-15 01:29 (UTC)
cihuatlatoani: (Neutral2)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] cihuatlatoani 2014-10-15 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
We should certainly mark 16, then.
debate_avenger: (I can't explain.)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] debate_avenger 2014-10-15 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
The fact that it's even giving us an ominous warning is suspicious by itself, though. Since when did they give warnings in this...

...Well, should we just... mark everything, then?

[...Somehow this seems like a bad idea, but...]
cihuatlatoani: (Looking Down)

Re: DISCUSSION

[personal profile] cihuatlatoani 2014-10-15 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
Unfortunately, there seem to be no other guidelines for what is dangerous and what is not.