AMALTHEA

[soulping]

[ The paths lead to a room -- well not a room. A clearing of trees, wherein a large oaken table sits in the center, with chairs for every member present. ]

[ In the center of the table, there is a deep-set burning flame. At each chair, glass stones glisten. ]

Comments

Re: DISCUSSION

[unguilded]

Three each to play as we wish, and we can't use more than one on one person.

If you can, please play one of yours on Gull from Takshaka for this round. Not even counting just us, there's a chance we can get him out safely in the end. He's from Cascade's world.

Re: DISCUSSION

[rampager]

I understand the rules, Rook. You need not repeat them.

[some bristling of temper]

Takshaka is an allied team. I don't mind.

Re: DISCUSSION

[unguilded]

I'm trying to figure out the math of what we can do on our own-- for one round, anyway. Who knows if we'll get three stones again if this continues...

Aside from Gull ... maybe we can try to scatter the rest between our allies evenly. I don't mind playing my other two on the others from either Takshaka or Ometotchtli just to cover them while we figure out the rest.

Re: DISCUSSION

[rampager]

Regardless of what might happen after this round, we must play what we have now.

I have one more stone to spare for this round. Why Takshaka and Ometotchtli?

Re: DISCUSSION

[unguilded]

Just a suggestion to start covering some people we know. Takshaka-wise, Nightingale will get at least one stone from Opal, maybe more from her teammates. Someone like Kelvin on Ometotchtli is still new, so he might not know many others; I at least want to play one on him.

Maybe I can play my third on Ishiyama from Alectryon. He just woke up again, after being gone for a while ... I don't know if it's been long enough that the people he knew might be asleep or home now...

Re: DISCUSSION

[rampager]

Rather, why those teams when we have four other allies besides them? Does Amalthea have closer ties with Takshaka and Ometotchtli?

Re: DISCUSSION

[unguilded]

No, no, I was just naming off a couple to get started, that's all. No matter who we know or haven't met yet, we look after them all.

Which ... [Taking a glance at the list again.] reminds me to pay a visit to Ratatoskr later on. Because a couple of those names are new. So depending on how this round turns out, they might need a hand if they're really new.

Re: DISCUSSION

[rampager]

When we can.

[mild emphasis on that, because no, we actually can't rn]

All right. Assuming a positive outcome, I'll go with you.